Adams Law
- Home | Site Map | Contact Us
 
admanlaw
 
   
 
admans
 
admans
admans
Adams offers a FREE Business Audit, to all new clients and a similar length initial consultation on all new cases.
Click here for information
 
Home / Updates and Advice / Noisy Pubs
       
   
 

Expired Disciplinary Warnings

adams law

A further case has illustrated that employers cannot place reliance on a disciplinary warning that has expired, either in disciplinary proceedings or to justify dismissal.

In Airbus UK Ltd. v Webb, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has ruled that a Tribunal is ‘obliged, and not merely entitled, to ignore expired warnings’.

Mr Webb worked for Airbus as an aircraft fitter. In July 2004 he was dismissed for gross misconduct after he was found washing his car when he should have been working. He appealed against the decision to dismiss him and the disciplinary action was reduced to the lesser sanction of a final written warning which would remain on his record for 12 months.

Three weeks after the written warning expired, Mr Webb and four other employees were caught in the locker area, watching television, outside their normal break time. All five were found guilty of gross misconduct. Mr Webb was dismissed but the other four employees received final warnings because they had no prior disciplinary record.

Mr Webb claimed that he had been unfairly dismissed. The Employment Tribunal (ET) took into account the decision of the Scottish Court of Session in Diosynth Ltd. v Thomson in which the Court had ruled that the employee was entitled to assume that a similar warning meant what it said and that it would cease to have any effect after one year. The ET held that as Mr Webb would not have been dismissed had he not been given a previous warning, it followed that his dismissal was unfair.

Airbus appealed against the ET’s decision and lost. However, the EAT confessed to having some difficulty in deciding whether or not the ET is obliged to ignore past warnings that have expired, but judged on balance that it is. The EAT went on to suggest that although the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures suggests that final warnings should normally expire after 12 months, this need not always be the case. A longer time limit might be appropriate if the nature of the misconduct justifies it.

It is important to ensure that the time limits for disciplinary warnings fit the particular circumstances and that your policies and procedures allow you to issue an extended warning where this is deemed necessary. Contact Greg O’Shannessy on 020 7790 2000 or email [email protected] for advice.

 
lexcel
adam laws
adams law
adams law Commercial Property
adams law Corporate and Finance
adams law Employment
adams law Liquor Licensing
adams law Litigation
adams law
adams law Residential Conveyancing
adams law Residential Landlords
adams law Family & Matrimonial
adams law Immigration
adams law Employment
adams law Wills, Trusts and Probate